(657) 571-2607Book a callEspañol

Education · Retirement

When to claim Social Security: 62, 67 or 70

The adjustments are designed to be neutral for the average person — and you are not the average person. Here's the math from SSA's own schedules, the survivor wrinkle, and the 2025 law change every public employee should know about.

The short answer

For an FRA of 67, claiming at 62 permanently cuts your check about 30%; waiting to 70 raises it 24% via 8%-per-year delayed credits (both per SSA). Early claiming suits shorter life expectancy or genuine need; delay is longevity insurance and — critically for couples — sets the survivor's check. And as of the Social Security Fairness Act (January 2025), WEP and GPO are repealed: CalPERS and CalSTRS retirees now receive full earned benefits.

How the claiming math works

Social Security lets you start retirement benefits any month from age 62 to 70, and the monthly amount is adjusted — permanently — for when you start. The anchor is your full retirement age (FRA): 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later (SSA.gov, "Retirement Age Calculator"). Relative to your FRA benefit:

  • Claim early and the benefit is reduced roughly 6–7% per year — for an FRA of 67, claiming at 62 means about a 30% permanent reduction (SSA, "Starting Your Retirement Benefits Early").
  • Claim late and you earn delayed retirement credits of 8% per year past FRA, up to age 70 — a 24% increase for an FRA of 67 (SSA, "Delayed Retirement Credits"). There is no benefit to waiting past 70.
62 → 70
Between the earliest and latest claiming ages, the monthly check differs by roughly 77% for someone with an FRA of 67 (~70% of the FRA amount at 62 vs 124% at 70).
Computed from SSA reduction and delayed-credit schedules, ssa.gov

These adjustments are designed by SSA to be roughly actuarially neutral for the average lifespan — which is exactly why the right answer differs person to person: you are not the average.

The honest case for claiming at 62

  • Health or family history argues for it. The adjustments assume average longevity; below-average life expectancy shifts the math toward claiming early.
  • You need the income. Claiming early to avoid high-interest debt, or to stop draining a small portfolio at a dangerous rate in a down market, can be entirely rational.
  • A lower-earning spouse claiming early while the higher earner delays is a common and reasonable hybrid — it brings income in now while the larger benefit keeps growing.

One large caveat for early claimers who keep working: the earnings test. Before FRA, benefits are temporarily withheld once wages exceed an annual limit that SSA publishes each year ($1 withheld per $2 over the limit; a gentler rule applies in the FRA year). The withheld amounts are credited back through a recomputed benefit at FRA — so it's not money destroyed, but it surprises people (SSA, "Receiving Benefits While Working").

The case for full retirement age

Claiming at FRA gets you 100% of your earned benefit, ends the earnings test entirely, and — for many households — coincides with actually stopping work. It's the neutral midpoint: no reduction to regret, no need to bridge years of spending from savings while you wait for 70. Many decisions end here not because it's mathematically optimal but because it's affordable and simple, which are real virtues.

The case for waiting until 70

Delaying from 67 to 70 buys a 24% larger check, inflation-adjusted for life — Social Security is one of the very few income sources with a full annual COLA (8%/year in delayed credits, per SSA). The strongest arguments:

  • Longevity insurance. The risk that actually breaks retirements isn't dying early — it's living to 95. A maximised, inflation-protected benefit is the cheapest hedge against that outcome available to most people.
  • It's the survivor's check too. When one spouse dies, the survivor generally keeps the larger of the two benefits. The higher earner's delay therefore protects whichever spouse lives longer — this is often the single most important fact in the whole decision.
  • Bridge years can be tax-friendly. Spending from savings between retirement and 70 keeps taxable income low — years that can suit Roth conversions. That's a planning conversation, not a universal rule.

The cost is real: three years of checks foregone, funded from your portfolio — which is why delay suits people with savings to bridge the gap, and doesn't suit people without them.

Break-even math, honestly framed

Compare claiming at 67 versus 70 and the cumulative totals typically cross somewhere in your early-to-mid 80s: die before the crossover and early claiming "won"; live past it and delay wins by a growing margin every year. Two honest observations about that framing:

  • Break-even treats this as a bet you're trying to win. It isn't — it's insurance. Nobody calls homeowner's insurance a bad deal because the house didn't burn down. The scenario that needs protecting is the long life, because that's the one where money runs out.
  • Break-even ignores the survivor. For couples, the higher earner's benefit lasts until the second death, which makes the effective horizon longer and tilts the math further toward delay for the higher earner.

Used properly, break-even is a way to see the trade-off's shape — not a verdict.

Survivor and spousal interactions

Three rules do most of the work for couples (SSA, "Survivors Benefits" and "Benefits for Spouses"):

  • A spousal benefit can be up to 50% of the worker's FRA amount (reduced if claimed early). It does not grow with the worker's delayed credits past FRA.
  • A survivor benefit effectively replaces the smaller check with the larger one — and it does reflect the deceased's delayed credits. The higher earner's decision echoes for two lifetimes.
  • Divorced after a 10+ year marriage and unmarried? You may claim on an ex-spouse's record without affecting their benefit at all.

Public employees: WEP and GPO are repealed

If you or your spouse worked under CalSTRS, CalPERS or another public pension without paying Social Security tax, everything you may have read before 2025 about your benefits being slashed is now outdated. The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) were repealed by the Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law in January 2025, effective for benefits payable after December 2023 (SSA.gov, "Social Security Fairness Act"). In plain terms:

  • A teacher with a CalSTRS pension who also earned 40 credits in covered work now receives the full Social Security benefit those earnings produced — no WEP reduction.
  • A public retiree's spousal or survivor benefit is no longer offset by two-thirds of their government pension — GPO is gone.
  • SSA paid retroactive adjustments and raised ongoing benefits for those previously affected. If you never applied because GPO would have zeroed your benefit, it may now be worth applying.

The claiming-age framework in this guide now applies to public employees the same as everyone else — a genuine change from decades of prior rules of thumb.

A sane way to decide

  1. Pull both spouses' benefit estimates from ssa.gov/myaccount.
  2. Be honest about health and family longevity — in both directions.
  3. For couples: give the higher earner's delay extra weight, because it's the survivor's check.
  4. Check whether your savings can comfortably bridge the years before the chosen age — our how-much-to-retire framework and retirement calculator help size that.
  5. Remember it's not all-or-nothing: spouses can claim at different ages, and a claim can even be withdrawn once within 12 months (with repayment) or suspended at FRA to earn credits.

Common questions

Is Social Security going to run out before I collect?

The trustees project the combined trust funds' reserves deplete in the early-to-mid 2030s, after which ongoing payroll taxes would still cover roughly 75–80% of scheduled benefits (SSA Trustees Report). That is a real funding gap Congress must address — but "reduced without action" is very different from "zero," and claiming early out of fear locks in a permanent reduction to hedge a hypothetical one.

I'm a CalSTRS teacher. Do I get Social Security now?

The Social Security Fairness Act (January 2025) repealed WEP and GPO, so any benefit you earned from other covered work — or as a spouse or survivor — is no longer reduced because of your pension. It did not create benefits from uncovered teaching years themselves: you still need 40 covered credits (or a spousal/survivor basis) to qualify. Check your earnings record at ssa.gov.

Can I work and collect Social Security at the same time?

Yes. After FRA, with no limit or withholding. Before FRA, the earnings test temporarily withholds $1 per $2 earned above SSA's annual limit — but withheld amounts come back via a recomputation at FRA, so it's a deferral, not a loss. Benefits may also become partly taxable depending on income.

Does claiming early affect my spouse?

Your own early claim doesn't shrink your spouse's retirement benefit on their own record, but it can permanently lower the survivor benefit available if you're the higher earner and die first. That survivor effect is the main reason higher earners in couples are often advised to consider delaying.

This guide is general education, not individualised investment, legal or tax advice, and reading it does not create an advisory relationship. Individual circumstances vary — figures, limits and rules cited here change over time and may not apply to your situation. Confirm current figures with the IRS, the Social Security Administration, or your plan documents, and consider speaking with a qualified adviser or CPA before acting. Aduna Capital LLC is a California DFPI-registered investment adviser (CRD #311270). Aduna Capital LLC is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by CalSavers, the California State Treasurer's Office, CalPERS, CalSTRS, or any other retirement system, employer or school district named on this page.

Deciding when to claim — or how a pension fits in?

Bring your SSA statement and pension estimate. We'll walk the ages side by side, survivor math included.